Knowledge is a singular phenomenon. Knowledge is the result of the connection of conscious beings to reality. Intelligence is the result. What we reffer to as "Language" is knowledge. "Language" is not a means of communication, it is that which is communicated. Math is "Language", Physic's is "Language" Thought is "Language", Music is "Language" History, art, engineering and medicine are "Language". Knowledge of the periodic table of elements is a direct connection from the conscious individual to the material of the universe. "Thought" is not seperate from the object of the thought. The "thought" of pain is the direct awareness of the damage to the body, the "thought of hydrogen is a direct connection to the entity/object "Hydrogen"

If nature is:

1. Self-Modifing
2. Self-Correcting
3. Self-Maintaining
4. Self-Initiating
5. Self-Evolving

Then nature must be Self-Aware. Proof of God becomes irrelevant.

"Hell" is not solely a state of mind. Nor is it a condition of being or a condition of the individual. "Redemption" is the recognition of the point of seperation within yourself, the "flaw in the pattern" If you are in hell and you are unaware of the fact, the possability of "redemption" exists. If you are conscious of the fact that your in "hell" then you are in hell by choice.

Our actions in life cease upon death. The only real consequence is that, upon death, we are confronted with a gulf, an abyss, that seperate's us from the next phase of existance (if there is one). Our ability to successfully cross this abyss is based upon our development, or evolution as individuals, our maturity as beings. If sufficent, we are successful, if not, we fail to survive the transition. Our fate at that point is unknown. Harm to others, selfishness, insecurity, fear are the manifestations of immature individuals, these shall not pass. We are an immature race, those who are unconscious/unaware of thier existance or the universe around them are not a part of the process and are, therefor, unaffected. Those who are aware of their existance will either succeed or fail. There are many pregnancies, only a small number of them result is successful birth. It is the same thing. We are not "judged" we simply fail to evolve.

All living beings are equal, without exception

Men and Women are equal and identical in every way

God is beyond, beyond self, beyond all, beyond naught

Beyond 3 lie the mysteries of 2, the mysteries of 1 and the incomprehensibility of 0

Magick is the essence of existence, life is a magickial phenomenon

the highest expression of love is reproduction, faith and commitment. All else is self aggrandizement. Sex is biological, its function is biological.

Justice, truth and freedom are more important than food, water and air

Eternal life is a possibility, only a possibility. Any philosophy that requires continuation, or founds is beliefs upon the idea of continuation is false. This life, our conduct, and the ultimate value of our existence is only expressed in this life. Any conduct founded upon or requiring either reward, punishment or fulfillment after the end of life is false

The universe is an intelligent entity, we exist only as a part of that larger being.

arguments are irrelevant, reality is not affected either by your consent or your dissent. It is.

Emotions and feelings are two distinct and seperate phenomenon. Emotion is the generation and projection of life force, in the same manner as the generation and projection of light, it is given a "frequency" or "color" by our intelligence. Feelings are the perception or reception of those projected life forces, or "emotions". Logic is the structure of intelligence. life force is the source of its energy. Intelligence is a singular phenomenon that is the sum total of these elements along with memory and awareness. Consciousness is beyond these and is the culmination of these elements in "critical mass"

Science and religion are one in the same thing in the same manner as "emotions" and "feelings" are the same phenomenon.

Money is not "the root of all evil". Money doesn't exist. Money is an external representation of our failure as mature beings.

Humanity has a purpose. Its existance is neither random or accidental. We are intended to serve a function in "nature" just as the bee or plankton or whales. Each individual has the capability of fulfilling that purpose. The failure of that purpose or our understanding of it is in direct relation to our failure as mature beings

All humans are capable of anything that any individual human is capable of. We are all Davinci, Einstein, Ghandi or Bach.

The doctrine of absolute responsability states that "each and every human being is responsable for the future of humanity". This is true in every sense.

I am neither correct nor incorrect. Truth is an absolute, it is contained in all of reality. Whether or not it is percieved correctly is a function of the individuals ability to percieve.

Our break with nature is more fundamental that we believe. When the "Ice Man" lived 5000 years ago, we, on the surface, were closer to nature than now. Yet, the break was evident even then. What is eden? What state does the concept represent? Why should we need to hunt and kill? What is our intended relationship to nature?

The internet is the greatest threat to capitalism and the control of society in all of history. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries the miserable lot of the average person that resulted from industrialisation was to some degree lightened by the ability of labor to organise together for common goals. Had better communications existed the outcome might have been different. Thats all past us know. We live good. We eat too much. There is one problem, the rest of the planet. What was the fight really about? was it really just higher wages? better working conditions? or was is motivated by something more fundamental? Why is life unfair? How can the wealthy, privileged and powerfully really believe (or convincingly ask us to believe) that they are different somehow? That the world is the way it is and that they are just reacting like us? or is it that they are just "better" somehow. None of it works. Can anybody really answer the question? the threat is that through the internet, we will become self-controling.

I have a problem. I have an ocean of thought, theories, ideas and interpretations in my mind that cover a wide horizon of science and the study of the structure of nature. The problem is that I can never seem to get them to come out in an organized and systemic manner. Oh, well, I suppose that as long as they get recorded I at least that far ahead of the game.

I've just finished watdhing a program about evolution -vs- creation. The show itself wasn't over, I was finished watching. I consider myself to be a teleologist as a result of the studies that I've pursued regarding the nature of reality. I was stimulated to write this as a result of watching that show. I believe that the solution to this fundamental question of faith and science is that they are both right, and both wrong. The true nature of the process is that evolution is a directed process, intelligently initiated, and established as a self-organizing, self generating system that operated on a goal oriented basis. in essence; evolution is Gods way of achieving creation. The evidence for both is very strong, if taken on this basis and united into a single theory, the evidence becomes overwhelming. the patterns of nature and the constant seeming experimentation with different forms and methods of life and living organisims are the efforts of an intelligent systtem learning what it the best, most effective form of life and the most efficent means of propagating this thing called "life". I will elaborate more later.